|
45/00
5 September 2000
NUTRECO HOLDING BV/NORSK HYDRO ASA MERGER INQUIRY
ISSUES STATEMENT
The Competition Commission has sent letters to the main
parties in its inquiry into the proposed Nutreco BV/Norsk Hydro ASA merger.
An issues letter is always sent to main parties before
the Competition Commission has reached any conclusions and is designed
to highlight those matters which have been identified by the investigating
group for further consideration, and to ensure that nothing has been missed.
The statement of issues is being made public to inform all interested
parties should there be any further points they wish to raise with the
Competition Commission within the next week. No conclusions have yet been
reached by the Competition Commission about whether any matters operate
or may be expected to operate against the public interest.
In the context of trends and changes in the salmon farming
and associated industries, such as producer-led consolidation and vertical
integration, and also trends and changes in consumer demand, the Commission
has identified a number of issues that it wishes to consider arising from
the information received from the main and third parties. The issues the
Commission intends to consider are as follows:
Market definition
What is the most appropriate definition of the market
or markets relevant to the merger, taking into account such factors as:
whether Scottish salmon is distinct from all other salmon and whether
Atlantic salmon from Pacific salmon; the substitutability of other fish
for salmon; whether salmon that has been gutted forms a distinct market
from salmon that has undergone secondary processing; and the geographic
extent of the market or markets.
Barriers to entry or expansion
Whether barriers to entry exist in the salmon farming
market. For example whether barriers arise because of: limited site availability;
regulatory restrictions - environmental, trade or otherwise - in each
relevant country; access to capital; the necessity of access to technical
knowledge; access to buyers of salmon and to processing capacity and subsequent
purchasers; access to supplies of raw materials; the existence of excess
capacity; constraints on imports. Whether the merger would affect the
prospects for new entry into the salmon farming market. Whether the merger
would have the effect of exacerbating, diminishing or changing the nature
of any barriers to entry. Whether there are any barriers to, and the prospects
of, new entry into the secondary processing, salmon feed and smolt market
or markets.
Effect on competition
Whether the merger would reduce competition between salmon
farmers and whether the position of the remaining competitors would be
weakened as a result of the merger. Whether competition between salmon
feed suppliers would be reduced as a result of the merger. Whether competition
between smolt producers would be reduced as a result of the merger.
Market power
The effect of any increased market power resulting from
the merger including: the ability by the merged companies to restrict
competition by not exploiting sites in Scotland; the ability to discriminate
between feed customers on matters such as price, quality or contractual
arrangements; whether the market power of the merged companies in the
salmon feed market could be used to increase their market power in salmon
production; whether the merger would threaten the status or viability
of Scottish Quality Salmon; whether the merger would give the merged companies
an unfair advantage in price negotiations with any of its customers.
Other issues
Whether the merger would have adverse effects on employment
or local incomes in Scotland and whether the merger would adversely affect
the environment. Whether the merger would enable the merged companies
to gain more control over the farmed salmon chain. Whether any changes
made by the merged companies in the management, production and strategy
of salmon farming would increase the likelihood of a lower quality product
being produced; and whether the effect of the merger has the potential
to undermine to reputation of Scottish salmon. Whether there would be
any other adverse effects or benefits arising from the merger.
The public interest
Whether the merger might be expected to operate against
the public interest.
This press notice is also available on the Competition
Commission web site: www.competition-commission.org.uk/45-00.htm
or from the Joint Reference Secretary (Nutreco/Hydro Seafood Inquiry),
Room 338, New Court, 48 Carey Street, London WC2A 2JT.
Notes to Editors
- The Nutreco/Hydro Seafood reference was made by the Secretary of State
for Trade and Industry, under Section 64(8) of the Fair Trading Act
1973, on 17 July 2000 (see DTI press release P/2000/495). No conclusions
will be reached about whether any matters may be expected to operate
against the public interest until the Commission submits its report
to the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry on 16 November 2000.
- The inquiry is being chaired by Dr Gill Owen, one of the Commission's
members. The other members are Graham Hadley, Judith Hanratty and Anthony
Steele.
- Further information can be obtained from the Competition Commission
website at www.competition-commission.org.uk/ref.htm
- Press enquiries should be directed to:
Francis Royle, Press Officer Tel: 020 7271 0242
|