Civil Engineering
Consultancy Services
A report on the supply of civil engineering consultancy services
in relation to restrictions on advertising
Summary of report (html format)
Full text (pdf format)
Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded from http://www.adobe.com
Summary
We were asked to investigate and report on the advertising
rules observed by consulting civil engineers and the effects
of their restrictions on the public interest.
We were primarily concerned with two sets of rules. Those
of the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) impose certain
restrictions on the content, form and distribution of members'
advertisements. Those of the Association of Consulting Engineers
(ACE) at present prohibit advertising by members except for
directory entries in an accepted form and announcements of
practice changes. Many consulting civil engineers observe
the rules of both ICE and ACE. Some
consulting civil engineers belong to professional associations
other than ICE and ACE, but we found that the effects of observance
by them of the rules of the other bodies did not require further
examination.
We found that observance of the ICE rules by consulting civil
engineers was not against the public interest. We were concerned,
however, that some members of ICE appear to believe that the
ICE rules are more restrictive than the interpretation we
were given, and we have suggested that ICE should take steps
to clarify the position.
We found that the observance of the present ACE rules by its
consulting civil engineer members is against the public interest.
These rules restrict competition within the civil engineering
consultancy profession and hamper the potential client in
making an informed choice. These effects are not outweighed
by benefits from the rules in protecting the client or maintaining
professional
standards.
We consider that ACE should amend its rules to avoid the detrimental
effects we identified. The broad principles underlying any
new rules should be that consulting civil engineers are free
to advertise in accordance with the principles of the British
Code of Advertising Practice but that such advertising should
contain nothing which would reasonably be regarded as likely
to bring the profession into disrepute.
ACE told us that its Council would shortly be putting revised
rules to the membership for approval and ACE described the
proposals currently under consideration. The proposed rules
as described to us would appear to be broadly consistent with
the principles outlined above.
Full text
Contents |
Chapters |
|
| Chapter
1 |
Summary |
| Chapter
2 |
Background |
| Chapter
3 |
Changes in advertising restrictions |
| Chapter
4 |
The regulation of advertising by consulting civil engineers |
| Chapter
5 |
Views of consulting civil engineers and other parties |
| Chapter
6 |
The case for the restrictions |
| Chapter
7 |
Conclusions |
| |
List of signatories |
|
|
Back to the top |