FirstBus Plc and S B Holdings Limited: A report on
the merger situation
Summary of report (html format)
Full text (pdf format)
Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded from http://www.adobe.com
Summary
In June 1996 FirstBus plc (FirstBus) acquired 100 per cent of the issued
share capital of S B Holdings Limited (SBH). Under the reference (see
Appendix 1.1) we have to decide whether, as a result of this transaction,
a merger situation qualifying for investigation has been created and,
if so, whether that situation operates or may be expected to operate against
the public interest.
SBH has a fleet of some 1,200 buses operating mainly in Glasgow and
the outlying towns to the north and east of the Glasgow conurbation. In
the year ended 31 March 1996 it generated a turnover of £91.9 million
and an operating profit of £11.2 million representing 12.2 per cent
of turnover. SBH conducts its operations through three subsidiaries, Strathclyde
Buses Limited (SBL), Comlaw 313 Limited trading as GCT and Kelvin Central
Buses Limited (Kelvin).
FirstBus's Scottish operations (apart from SBH) are in Aberdeen and
north-east Scotland, central Scotland and the Scottish Borders, and have
a fleet of some 850 buses. In the year ended 31 March 1996 FirstBus's
Scottish operations generated a turnover of £60.4 million and an
operating profit of £9.2 million representing 15 per cent of turnover.
FirstBus is the largest UK provider of local bus services with over 19
per cent of the total, measured by turnover. It has a UK fleet of some
6,800 vehicles. In the year ended 31 March 1996 its UK operations generated
a turnover of £356.3 million and an operating profit of £35.1
million representing 9.9 per cent of turnover.
We conclude that a merger situation qualifying for investiga-tion has
been created. The share of supply test is satisfied in a substantial part
of the UK: the area comprising the unitary authorities of Argyll and Bute,
East Ayrshire, East Dunbartonshire, Renfrewshire, Glasgow City, Inverclyde,
North Ayrshire, North Lanarkshire, South Ayrshire, South Lanarkshire,
West Dunbartonshire and East Renfrewshire. In that area SBH supplies 53
per cent of the bus services and FirstBus's other subsidiaries 1 per cent.
The operations of FirstBus's subsidiary Midland Bluebird Limited (Midland
Bluebird) are adjacent to the north and east of SBH's territory. Midland
Bluebird's operations have recently been enhanced by the addition of part
of the operations and assets of another FirstBus subsidiary, Eastern Scottish
Omnibuses Limited (known as SMT); we refer to this enhanced business as
the enlarged Midland Bluebird.
We consider that in the deregulated market actual and potential competition
from large adjacent operators is the main safeguard against abuse of a
dominant position. Following the merger this element is significantly
reduced for the foreseeable future. FirstBus is by far the largest operator
in central and south-east Scotland where SBH supplies 40 per cent of the
bus services and FirstBus's other subsidiaries 21 per cent. The merger
situation has eliminated competition and potential competition between
FirstBus and SBH. The scale and dominance of FirstBus/SBH in central and
south-east Scotland is likely to deter competition with SBH from the two
other large adjacent operators, Stagecoach Holdings plc (Stagecoach) and
Cowie Group PLC (Cowie). It will also deter entry by others. We do not
believe the remaining constraints will put sufficient pressure on FirstBus
to ensure that fares and subsidies are kept down and the frequency of
services maintained.
Nor do we believe there are likely to be any benefits to the public
interest arising from the merger such as to offset the detriment to competition.
We conclude that the merger situation is against the public interest.
Behavioural remedies would be inadequate to remedy the adverse effects
we have identified. Nor do we consider that the divestment of the enlarged
Midland Bluebird would be sufficient, because we are not confident that
this would reinstate the sort of potential competition that would keep
SBH on its toes.
We recommend that FirstBus should be required to divest:
(a) the enlarged Midland Bluebird; and
(b) part of the business of SBH including, as a minimum:
(i) one of the four central Glasgow depots and associated assets;
(ii) a network of routes spread reasonably over Glasgow representing
20 per cent of SBH's turnover; and
(iii) a bus fleet appropriate to service these routes,
to a single buyer approved by the Secretary of State. FirstBus should
further be required to identify a firm buyer with whom agreement in principle
has been reached to purchase the businesses concerned, within nine months
of the publication of this report. Should the recom-mended divestment
of part of the business of SBH prove to be impractical, we recommend that
FirstBus should be required to divest SBH in its entirety, without divestment
of any of Midland Bluebird's operations.
Full text
Contents
|
Part I
|
Summary and Conclusions
|
| Chapter 1 |
Summary |
| Chapter 2 |
Conclusions |
Part II
|
Background and evidence
|
| Chapter 3 |
The companies: history, finance and the acquisition |
| Chapter 4 |
The market |
| Chapter 5 |
Views of FirstBus |
| Chapter 6 |
Views of third parties |
| |
List of signatories |
Appendices
|
|
| (The numbering of the appendices indicates
the chapters to which they relate) |
| 1.1 |
The reference and background |
| 2.1 |
Options offered by FirstBus to the DGFT |
| 2.2 |
Proposed undertakings to Strathclyde Passenger Transport
Authority |
| 3.1 |
The disposal of the ten Scottish Bus Group companies
and the four municipal bus companies in Scotland and their
ownership as at December 1996 |
| 3.2 |
Chronology of events |
| 3.3 |
Principal subsidiary undertakings of FirstBus at December
1996 |
| 3.4 |
Analysis of prices paid for bus companies (Acquisitions
made in the two years to 30 August 1996 by listed transport
companies with bus operations) |
| 4.1 |
Prepaid and discount ticket schemes available from FirstBus/SBH
subsidiaries |
| 5.1 |
The quality transport partnership |
Back to the top
|