Trinity Plc/Mirror Group Plc and Regional Independent
Media Holdings Limited/Mirror Group Plc: A report on the proposed merger
situations
Summary of report (html format)
Full text (pdf format)
Adobe Acrobat Reader can be downloaded from http://www.adobe.com
Summary
On 12 March 1999 the Secretary of State referred to us the proposed transfers
of newspaper titles and related assets owned by Mirror Group plc (Mirror
Group) to Trinity plc (Trinity) and to Regional Independent Media Holdings
Limited (RIM) respectively. Our terms of reference are in Appendix 1.1.
Mirror Group publishes both national, and regional and local newspapers.
Trinity and RIM are publishers of regional and local newspapers.
We considered whether either of the proposed transfers would affect the
accurate presentation of news and free expression of opinion. Both Trinity
and RIM told us that they followed a policy of editorial independence
for all their newspapers, and we found no evidence that led us to doubt
this. Both companies also said that they intended to maintain The Mirrors
current left-of-centre political stance. As we think there are strong
commercial reasons for doing so, we do not believe that either transfer
would affect The Mirrors political stance.
We considered whether the quality, or even survival, of Mirror Group
titles would be affected by:
a. the fact that neither Trinity nor RIM had experience of managing national
newspapers; or
b. financial pressures arising from either transfer, particularly the
transfer to RIM, in view of its high level of gearing;
but we decided that there was unlikely to be a serious risk in either
case. We therefore conclude that neither of the proposed transfers poses
a general threat to the accurate presentation of news and free expression
of opinion.
We examined the effects of each transfer on concentration of ownership
of the press in the UK as a whole, in relevant regions of England and
Wales, in Scotland, and in Northern Ireland. At the UK level we found
that the transfers would give Trinity/Mirror Group a share of the circulation/distribution
of all regional and local titles of 24.0 per cent and RIM/Mirror Group
17.2 per cent. However, we decided that these UK concentration figures
had little relevance for competition because they added together circulation
figures for titles serving different areas. We thought that diversity
of the press would be adequately protected by editorial independence,
except in Northern Ireland.
Neither transfer would create significant overlaps of regional and local
titles in England and Wales. On the overlap between Mirror Groups
national titles and the regional and local titles of Trinity and RIM in
England and Wales, we think that the extent of competition between national
titles on the one hand, and regional and local titles on the other, is
too limited for this aspect of the transfers to be a matter of concern.
RIM has no titles in Scotland. Trinity owns mainly local weeklies and
Mirror Group owns the Daily Record and Sunday Mail (which have Scotland-wide
circulation) plus one free weekly. We think that the extent of competition
between Scotland-wide daily and Sunday titles and local weeklies is limited
and that a combination of the two would not be so attractive to advertisers
as to threaten the survival of rival titles. Given that new entry by free
weeklies is not difficult, we do not believe that the relatively small
overlap between Mirror Groups weekly title and those of Trinity
is a problem.
RIM has no titles in Northern Ireland. Trinity has the Belfast Telegraph
(an evening daily), Sunday Life and a free weekly series. Mirror Group
owns the News Letter (a morning daily), the Derry Journal (a paid-for
bi-weekly) and some free weeklies. The News Letter has a distinctively
unionist ethos. The Belfast Telegraph, although broadly unionist, takes
a more middle-of-the-road political stance.
We think that the increased concentration of ownership that would result
from the transfer to Trinity of Mirror Groups Northern Ireland titles
would have the following public interest detriments:
a. If both the Belfast Telegraph and the News Letter were owned by Trinity,
the majority of us think that convergence between the two titles would
be likely to occur, leading to the loss of the News Letters distinctive
voice in representing unionist opinion. One of us, Charles Henderson,
agrees that there is a real risk of losing the News Letters distinctive
voice but does not believe that it is sufficiently likely that he can
have an expectation of it occurring. We all agree that this outcome, if
it occurred, would threaten the adequate representation in the press of
the range of political opinion in Northern Ireland.
b. Trinity/Mirror Group would have a 67 per cent share of advertising
in regional and local newspapers in Northern Ireland. Such a high concentration
would reduce competition for newspaper advertising, leading to higher
costs for advertising in Northern Ireland than would otherwise be the
case.
We considered carefully whether the proposed transfer to Trinity would
threaten the future of The Irish News. If The Irish News were driven out
of business as a result of the transfer, this would be a serious public
interest detriment. However, on balance we do not believe that the risks
are such that we can have an expectation of this detriment occurring.
We conclude that the transfer to RIM of Mirror Groups titles may
not be expected to operate against the public interest. The transfer to
Trinity of these titles would not operate against the public interest
in England and Wales, or in Scotland, but may be expected to do so in
Northern Ireland for the reasons given in paragraph 1.8.
We recommend that Trinity should be required to give undertakings to
dispose of the News Letter, the Derry Journal, the Belfast News, the North
Down News, the Journal Extra, and their related newspaper assets on terms
acceptable to the Secretary of State if the proposed transfer of Mirror
Groups titles goes ahead. These disposals should be within six months
of the completion of any transfer to Trinity of the relevant titles.
Full text
Contents
|
Part I
|
Summary and Conclusions
|
| Chapter 1 |
Summary |
| Chapter 2 |
Conclusions |
Part II
|
Background and evidence
|
| Chapter 3 |
Background to the proposed transfers and the companies
involved |
| Chapter 4 |
Newspaper markets and the effects of the two proposed
mergers |
| Chapter 5 |
Views of the main parties |
| Chapter 6 |
Views of third parties |
| |
List of signatories |
Appendices
|
|
| (The numbering of the appendices indicates
the chapters to which they relate) |
| 1.1 |
The references and background |
| 2.1 |
Northern Ireland: net reach of daily and Sunday titles |
| 3.1 |
Mirror Group: UK newspaper titles and circulation |
| 3.2 |
Mirror Group: profit and loss accounts, 1994 to 1998 |
| 3.3 |
Mirror Group: balance sheets, 1994 to 1998 |
| 3.4 |
Mirror Group: cash flow statements, 1994 to 1998 |
| 3.5 |
Trinity: principal newspaper titles and circulation |
| 3.6 |
Trinity: profit and loss accounts, 1994 to 1998 |
| 3.7 |
Trinity: balance sheets |
| 3.8 |
Trinity: cash flow statements, 1994 to 1998 |
| 3.9 |
RIM: principal newspaper titles and circulation |
| 3.10 |
RIM: profit and loss accounts, 1997 and 1998 |
| 4.1 |
Newspaper markets in the UK |
| 4.2 |
Previous Commission reports on newspapers and related
markets |
| 4.3 |
Readership profiles of certain national and regional
daily newspapers (titles) in England and Wales |
Back to the top
|